The picture on the right is the warp drive’s circuit.

There is relevant information concerning this at: The seven walls and also for braking the spaceship.

Also about the relay at: Braking the spaceship/g-forces, as people already know.

Again, even DC circuits conduct in both ways. I have a theory about this.

Regular electrons go from the minus pole (-) to the plus pole (+), while carrying a negative electric field. The theory is that the approaching of the electrons attract a positive electric field, in the form of ghost particles, so a positive electric field without an actaull particle. The charge takes the path of the least resistance and the electric fields would subdue when they meet eachother. Imagine a row of 3 horizontal dots. The dot in the center is negative, while the others are positive, so the electron would continue conducting.

The electrons in the warp drive MAYBE never go to the plus (+) side of the battery. Exhausting by anhillation at the minus (-) could be minimal, when it even occurs in the first place.

I assume that the direction of the electrons and their current are two different things.

We use two relays to stop immediately by the Meissner effect. The wains accelerate electrons.

I know it’s too late, but I’m not sure about the super battery, concerning the poles.

Electricity takes the path of the least resistance as known, so the material between the poles of the super battery should have a high enough resistance, but that’s perhaps common. I mean the Piëzoelectric material of the circuit of course.

The zanes/neutrinos go to the side of the minus pole, because the current from an ordinary circuit flows from plus to minus, and a dark matter circuit seems to flow from minus to plus, although the conductor could make the properties the same (similar but different to the swap of properties in antimatter), so the dark matter current would go from plus to minus as well, because it behaves the same. The regular & dark matter electrons collide and they add the same momentum (pole) to eachother.

We can make a steering wheel by adding four not too thick or thin rods to the zane/neutrino generator (including the tokamak, thats below) with a not too thick or thin circle attached, which has handles like a pirate ship wheel, while being in the right proportions.

The warp drive circuit is surrounded by a immensely strong tokamak to create the zane/neutrino generator. The tokamak is the steering wheel, while it has handbars like a pirate ship’s steering wheel. The magnetic fields are in God’s ratio, because it should prevent a short circuit with it’s own compartiments from positively charged dark matter electrons by bending the charge with magnetism, but still allowing conductance, because the conductance is overwhelming with a higher Δcharge. The short circuit now has a nihil probability function to conduct regular & dark matter electrons unbothered (I’m not saying that the electrons stay in the same spot), due to preventing the short circuit before it turns into zane/neutrino wavelengths for mass, and the relay should also be sensitive to the respective superconducting electromagnets inside the tokamak.

It’s because atoms consist for 99,9% out of empty space as known, while taking into account that the chance remains the same after every atom, so if we flip a coin 20 times, and it’s 20 times heads in a row, then the next coin flip still has a 50% chance to be heads as known. It’s also because the atom’s electrons aren’t in the same spot. I assume that free electrons could be captured after a wrong annihilation too, so they could get a new one back. The magnetism should accordingly fail to collide the regular electrons with dark matter electrons into zanes/neutrinos. It hopefully fails when the particles approach eachother, instead of conducting through.

(The zane/neutrino generator needs an ultra high frequency AC voltage, because the zane/neutrino must be waves (folding frequency) in spacetime, so the output is AC. We probably also need the AC to collide the electrons, attracting eachother with every vibration (one third wavelength), so every crest & through.

The wires of the zane/neutrino generator are made of boron to optimize the conduction at both poles, because we need a conduction symmetry from both poles to collide the electrons, and boron is stabilized by either adding or substracting the charge of 3 electrons by valence. They repel eachtoher by antigravity, but the charge will be stronger when the radius get’s small enough, so the conduction must be ideal. I also assume that they treat regular & dark matter electrons the same, besides conducting both poles equal. We can perhaps replace the boron with garmen, or there’s no other way than boron, due to this symmetry.

We use the asymmetric parity to travel interstellar. The P block compartiment is a Piëzoelectric dark matter material, which are prevented from annihilating with regular mass by antigravity with a really tiny radius with antigravity, and the wain with the capacitors are the circuit for DC to high frequency AC.

The Piëzoelectric dark matter material must be in a sufficient (DC voltage/pressure), while we connect the wires to the Piëzoelectric materials by having an strong surrounding suction cup.

The lamp is optionally a carbonic glass (glassy carbon) lamp to heat one of the pole’s dark matter electrons inside out again, into regular matter electrons.

The impermeability to gases & liquids makes the lamp last so strong and long lasting, because the solubility increases with temperature, so temperature swings affect the strain rate on the glass (imploding and exploding), which has a yield strength, although it isn’t transparant enough for streetlight as example, although we could perhaps find a mateiral, which is also transparant. We optionally replace the glass with carbonic glass (glassy carbon), due to it’s impermeabilty to retain it’s vacuum, becuase regular lamps would burst.

I also predict that the aluminum reflects the zanes/neutrinos to stop it from going into the wrong direction by the alternating pole, but it must be wide enough concerning the flux, although we could also perhaps make a curved one, like half a circle. I assume it’s due to the repelling of the oscillating charge from the zanes/neutrinos by some kind of field.

The compartiments could be packaged as a giant chip (but don’t call it a chip please and make the installation big) with an arrow for the direction of our spaceship.

The endpoints of the wain are both negative like a negative diode (NEGATIVE semiconductor), although one pole is really strong, which is also necessary to pass the border where charge dominates the antigravity, and it is also necessary to create the ultra high frequency AC. One end point is more negative than the other, while the garmen of the wain is isolated for oxygen with boron here.

GO TO: Fast compact battery.

We use capacitors as extra poles to enable the current to flow in two directions by adding the positive charge of the dark matter electrons to the weaker negative charge (side) of the wain (negative semiconductor), so by the dark matter electrons. The current get’s relatively positive when the capicitors charge up sufficiently, and the positive currents have time to build up when the reverse direction is still present, while the current is negative when the capicitor just discharged, because the reverse direction returns when the capacitors discharge. Charging & discharging doesn’t happen in frames as example, because it goes more gradually to create waves (folding frequency) by ultra high frequency AC, and we need two dark matter Piëzoelectric materials, due to the alternating current, while both poles cause the Piëzoelectric material to compress. The net current goes to the minus pole.

The boron wires, except possibly the superconducting electromagnets for the relay could be isolated by vinyl of course. The reducing agents and the oxidizing agents should be packaged of course.

The whole warp drive installation could have a top, which is partly transparant.

We could use a circular metal box, which has a metal edge (called X for the explanation) as well. We place the circular glass plate at the metal box, while the glass is covered (above & beneath) by a metal at the edge (X)

We can fuse the metal entirely against the side of edge (X), so against the two layers (above & beneath the glass) from top to bottom, so it’s still transparant in the middle. We could thus however fuse the entire wall of the circular metal box. The two layers should perhaps be thin but strong, to bend easier over it.

We would use very thick layered toughened glass with a dense not noble gas inside, becuase they would prevent the magnetism by the circular orbits of the electrons, and we compress the gas for superconduction, so we use a valve for the gas. The increase in pressure gives an indication of the drop in temperature.

The warp drive installation fits tightly inside a bigger hollow cylinder, so it can turn around. The bigger cylinder is attached to the spaceship’s floor. The smaller cylinder is partly closed of, so the bigger cylinder is bend over the smaller cylinder to prevent the smaller cylinder from getting out.

The smaller cylinder extends above (is connected) into a wheel (maybe some sort of pirate wheel) The smaller cylinder’s bend above by the bigger cylinder shouldn’t entirely cover edge (X), to save room for the wheel extension too, so the edge needs space for both the bend and the wheel, which means that the edge (X) should be quiet thick.

On top of this page are some thoughts about the steering wheel.

Maybe with motor oil. GO TO: Energy infrastructure.

Or the transparant wheel should maybe be done otherwise.

Everyone knows Einstein’s most famous formula below. I don’t want to piss people of, but I want to make a tiny remark, which I find interesting.

I won’t argue that the formula is way of reality, but I have the feeling that our reality doesn’t behave exactly in such a humanly systematic manner. I have not such a great insight on this, because I don’t know the reasoning behind the formula. All I’m saying is that reality could have a small deviation from the formula by the aspect of coincidence.

Curvatures in spacetime probably don’t have a Doppler effect by stretching spacetime, which can be demonstrated with a falling box with a lamp.

My theory is that the tachyon’s mass is negative, because it’s actually faster than C SOMEHOW (?). Instead of moving the world around itself like our spaceship, which has kinetic energy in the form of mass. Moving the world around instead of moving ourselves makes a lot more sense if spacetime is an ocean. We could however indeed wonder where the border is where energy turns into mass.

The one directional kinetic energy perhaps turns into 1 directional mass, which flows spacetime before reaching lightspeed, so in other words before the time stands still for the electricity.

We don’t experience a difference in GRAVITATIONAL time dilation after reaching mass (probably 1 dimensional) from kinetic energy, because the escape velocity by gravity, increases in the same rate as our acceleration by gravity, so our Schwarzschild radius remains.

Gravitational framedragging of electromagnetism sends the electromagnetic signal to the future, because C is the same for every observer.

I don’t think that we risk infinit mass when we warp, or maybe we do. Something else could perhaps cause infinit mass.

It would get catastrophic when the mass gets close to infinity. We would then be the party poopers/losers of our Multiverse. It would start with heavy endothermic nucluar fusion by the immense pressure causing dropping of the temperature, possibly causing dark matter. It could maybe afterward cause macroscopic nucluar cleavage causing enormous energy and Higgs bosons (ANOTHER BIG BANG). Some particles could maybe have survived or be restored. There maybe used to be different and more heavy particles, while the super gravity could maybe be 1 dimensional. I don’t think that it necessarily has to be by a civilization, but my intuition tells me that the big bang could have been by a super black hole.

I assume our spaceship turns around (Even when a part of the velocity is caused by kinetic mass/moving the world around, That’s the theory.), due to the formula of squared-expansion (lengthcontraction + for two dimensions). In which I mean that the front kinda becomes the back, because we square everything in the formula for the two dimensional curvature (surface, so kinda like latitude & longitude) of spacetime, which leads to:

length squared * (1 – velocity squared / C squared),

for the 2 dimensional surface of spacetime from our spaceship, although the length isn’t the same for every dimension. Spacetime could however cover all 3 dimensions.

Our actual spaceship has 3 dimensions, so I assume that the whole formula goes to the power 3 by cubic-expansion & cubic-contraction.

Neglecting the 3 extra dimensions from the dark matter Piëzoelectric material, and also neglecting dimensions like the spin, so:

(length cubic) * (1 – velocity to the power 4 / C to the power 4)

for the 3 dimensions of our spaceship. The length isn’t the same for every dimension, while the achieved mass at relativistic speeds perhaps is conserved when we reach post-relativistic speeds,

and we note that we don’t actually reach C by flowing spacetime (the world around it) with the kinetic mass, so it wouldn’t take the root of a negative number, and the mass wouldn’t get negative either.

It also means that we can’t use the change in angle of a Pytagoras triangle, concerning lengthcontraction & lengthexpansion.

The length isn’t the same for all 3 dimensions of course, so it’s slightly different. We just replace (length squared & length cubic) with (surface & volume). The length is the only thing that’s contracting and expanding though. The other dimensions just follow along, so it just turns around. I’m not excluding imaginary numbers, but I assume that they don’t apply here.

The wave in spacetime inverts, because the surface (wave in spacetime) only has two dimensions creating a spacetime twist, so it practically isn’t inverted for our sight (although we have to test it properly of course, it’s just what I think), so I think that the passing Higgs bosons get flinged to the back of our spaceship by the spacetime twist, which means it is turned **π** radians for resistance, and the vacuum luckily only contains Higgs bosons, so we can reach post-relativistic speeds, while it becomes lengthexpansion after C, although we don’t use rockets, because of this, due to the inability to endure the resistance inside the combustion chamber, due to having a flat back (front) with a miniscule though present resistance for post-relativistic speeds by a spacetime twist, so we use a streamlined rotational symmetric spaceship, becuase airplane-like mainframes would get their wings ripped, due to the post-relativistic speeds and their corresponding lift, while the same goes for the rotor of helicopters of course. We can’t get something like the picture above to rise of course, and hot air balloon & zeppelins are even more ridiculous.

The x and y coordinates may not change according to the length contraction, but the surface changes a bit like a sphere, so imagine contracting the z of the sphere, although our spaceship is different:

Conserving the shape, becuase it maintains it’s surface with a varying length. The cubic-expansion & squared-expansion are only macroscopic near C. People would understand when we do a realistic graphical simulation of length contraction of a sphere as example. The border of the spacetime twist would however be a 2 dimensional circle in this case.

Annihilating the nucleus (like smashing rocks into pieces) to create zanes/neutrinos isn’t possible, due to the conserved baryon & lepton number.

I guess we can determine the annihilation border with a graphical calculator. Coulomb’s law = Newton’s gravitational law (The intersection of course), while using the values properly: The contstants for gravity (positive & negative mass) and coulomb’s contsant (positive & negative charge), while the radius is value X, but I’m not totally sure if reality exactly behaves this way. We’re talking about the case of the electrons.